My maternal grandmother was always known to us as Felicina. She was
not even aware of the fact that her legal "civil" name was Evangelina
until she was required to obtain an official birth certificate for an
immigration or social security process. Thank God that the person
working at the registrar was smart enough to look around a bit and
find her certificate under her "other" name by matching her parents,
place of birth, etc. I think that she even had her birthdate wrong
by a few days. Her civil name was Evangelina and nowhere in her
civil record did the name Felicina appear. I think this is a pretty
common phenomenon. The other is the six brothers whose name
is "Jose" but each goes under some other name such that "Jose de
Jesus" is called Chuy, Jose Antonio is called "Tonyo" and Jose
Francisco is called "Pancho".
--- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, Alicia Carrillo <alliecar@p...> wrote:
> This is so interesting and too much of a coincidence.
>
> My tia who´s my dad´s youngest sister called me today to say that
her sister-in law was coming into town, that is my uncle´s wife who
I´ve never met. We met for the first time today and I also met a
first cousin, their daughter. We were exchanging names and she asked
me "Do you want my full name", and I said of course. She laughed and
proceeded to tell me what was behind her laugh. Her mother chose her
name to be Noemi but when she was baptized she was baptized as
Liduvina, Noemi, Avelar and at the civil registry as Liduvina Avelar.
>
> She always went by the name Noemi but when she went to take exams
to get into preparatory school she filled out the exam form as Noemi
and the teacher came around to see who Noemi was because the legal
(civil) documents presented said Liduvina not Noemi and they did not
have anyone registered as Noemi. That´s the first time she knew she
was something other than Noemi. She then proceeded to ask why and she
was told that it was her aunt/godmother who chose the name Liduvina
because she liked it and she was the one who went to the civil
registry to notify the registrar of her birth and she was the
godmother at the baptism so there again she was the one who told them
her given name.
>
> I believe my cousin is around 35-40 years of age, so you see it's
still happening there, not only in the distant past.
>
> Alicia Avelar de Carrillo
> San Jose, Ca
>
> Irma GomezLucero <igomezlucero@c...> wrote:
> I recall telling my mom & aunt about a family baptism record having
the wrong information. They informed the same about the mother not
attending her own child's baptism. The mother stayed in bed, had
chicken soup, and didn't bathe for 40 days! It used to be the
belief that a child needed to be baptized right away within a few
days of birth. Since the mother needed to "Guardar reposo" for 40
days, she was unable to attend the baptism. The father did go with
the godparents in our experience. My father even had to hire someone
to take care of my mother after my oldest sister's birth. This lady
cared for my mom, and their home during these 40 days which was a
real financial drain on them at the time. I guess he had to go to
work, and couldn't care for her & the baby. I met the elderly lady
on my last visit to Mexico with my dad. My mother only attended
her children's baptisms when she immigrated to the U.S.
> Irma
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> From: Joseph Puentes [mailto:makas@n...]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 2:36 PM
> To: ranchos@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [ranchos] information on records
>
>
>
> so if the mother was in bed and the father was off doing war or
work
> then no one for the family except the padrinos were there to tell
the
> story. . .hmmmm, this makes good sense now.
>
> thanks,
>
> joseph
>
> ps: where did you get the "Mothers were never at baptisms since the
> custom was for her to stay in bed for 40 days.. " information?
>
>
> Erlinda Castanon-Long wrote:
>
> >Many times information was being given by other members of the
party
> >at the church who did not know who parents or grandparents were,
> >especially if the people were deceased or the family had moved.
> >
> >Mothers were never at baptisms since the custom was for her to
stay in
> >bed for 40 days.. that meant that someone else had to give her
family
> >info and they were often wrong if there had been a remarriage
after
> >the death of the first wife, her mother, for instance..
> >
> >Linda from Wa.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Aguascalientes mexico Aguascalientes Zacatecas State code Jalisco
Criminal offenses
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "ranchos" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ranchos-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
|