|   |
|
I recall telling my mom & aunt about a family baptism
record having the wrong information. They informed the same about
the mother not attending her own child's baptism. The mother stayed in
bed, had chicken soup, and didn't bathe for 40 days! It used to be
the belief that a child needed to be baptized right away within a few days of
birth. Since the mother needed to "Guardar reposo" for 40 days, she was
unable to attend the baptism. The father did go with the godparents in our
experience. My father even had to hire someone to take care of my mother
after my oldest sister's birth. This lady cared for my mom, and their home
during these 40 days which was a real financial drain on them at the time.
I guess he had to go to work, and couldn't care for her & the baby. I
met the elderly lady on my last visit to Mexico with my dad.
My mother only attended her children's baptisms when she immigrated to the
U.S.
Irma From: Joseph Puentes [mailto:makas@...] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 2:36 PM To: ranchos@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [ranchos] information on records then no one for the family except the padrinos were there to tell the story. . .hmmmm, this makes good sense now. thanks, joseph ps: where did you get the "Mothers were never at baptisms since the custom was for her to stay in bed for 40 days.. " information? Erlinda Castanon-Long wrote: >Many times information was being given by other members of the party >at the church who did not know who parents or grandparents were, >especially if the people were deceased or the family had moved. > >Mothers were never at baptisms since the custom was for her to stay in >bed for 40 days.. that meant that someone else had to give her family >info and they were often wrong if there had been a remarriage after >the death of the first wife, her mother, for instance.. > >Linda from Wa. > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > |
|   |