RE: [ranchos] No Supo Dar Razon

["Janet V. Iglesias" <reynavaleria@...>]

I would think that he meant he didnt know their whereabouts.

---

From: ranchos@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ranchos@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joseph Puentes
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:34 PM
To: LosRanchos
Subject: [ranchos] No Supo Dar Razon

has anyone done study on this phrase. When the 
grandparents are missing 
and "No supo dar razon" is inserted what exactly 
does that mean? That 
the Son didn't know who his parents were? But if this 
is the case then 
why would there be records before and after where they are 
given? Or 
that he might have had a temporary case of of abnesia 
(sp--?).  Or that 
he just didn't want to disclose them?

Also I 
have a couple of records where only one grandparent is listed but 
many more 
where both are given.

So what gives?

No se dar 
razon!

thanks,

joseph