Linda,
FYI, there is a free edition of Legacy Family Tree software.
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/
It lacks some of the functions of the Deluxe Edition but it still does
so much, including the report I wrote about.
Victor
--- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long"
<longsjourney@y...> wrote:
>
> Victor, thank you for your tips, I've been told Legacy is the
> Cadillac of genealogy softwear and I will keep it in mind as my next
> purchase of genealogy tools. My computer skills are limited and it's
> a learn as I go project. I just started using the Family Tree
> program that allows me to put in people who are not related to each
> other so that when I can tie in a line I only have to merge them,
> what a blessing that has been!
> thanks again, Linda
>
> --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "v.h.villarreal"
> <raices_regias@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Linda,
> >
> > I have developed a somewhat similar system but I make use of a
> > function built into my genealogy software (Legacy) where I print
> out a
> > "source citation report". Of course this requires that everytime
> you
> > find a record on the IGI and make an entry in your genealogy
> database
> > that you record the batch number AND the date of the event as a
> source.
> >
> > With your source citation report on hand you just sort by
> > chronological order the entries grouped by source (batch number).
> > Then, when you get a chance to review the microfilm of each batch
> > number you just locate each date from your report in a forward
> > sequence, take a picture (or transcribe the manuscript) and move to
> > the next, etc.
> >
> > The ideal thing would be to read the whole book from start to
> finish
> > but the circumstances usually make it impractical if not
> impossible.
> > This is a very efficient method to get your records fast. Let's
> say
> > you need some 20 or 30 records from a microfilm you can get them in
> > about an hour.
> >
> > Hope this helps someone. The key is entering the batch number and
> the
> > event's date with each ancestor record, and then use your
> software.
> > The question is if the software you're using has this reporting
> > capability.
> >
> > Victor Villarreal
> > Reynosa, Mexico
> >
> > --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long"
> > <longsjourney@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have started using the batch numbers to do the groundwork
> before
> > > going to the FHC to read the actual films. There are so many
> > > entries that are smeared or too light to read that having them
> read
> > > by someone else has been a Godsend. In doing marriage records
> for
> > > Tamazula the online batch # gave me a marriage for my ancestor
> > > Benito Gutierrez that I never would have been able to read on my
> > > own. I allow for misspelled names and missing dates. There are
> > > times when I know I will have to order the film a second time
> but
> > > when time is an issue pulling all the surnames I'm researching
> with
> > > the % and a surname has saved the day more than once. Now when I
> go
> > > to read the film I've already started my record with dates and
> names
> > > in sequence so I do them first and then go back and do the
> complete
> > > record a second time. I always order at least 2 films because
> one
> > > usually is being used by someone else and I've waited up to 2
> months
> > > for a film to arrive or as little as 8 days.
> > > My husband is a contract worker so we've lived in 12 states in
> the
> > > last 10 years so there are times when I am trying to get as much
> > > information for my family lines as possible so time and
> availability
> > > can sometimes be an issue for me. If I'm in an area where there
> is
> > > no history center I have my groundwork done with the batch #'s
> and
> > > ready to go the next time I'm lucky enough to find a city with a
> > > center.
> > > Any other tips to help use the resources available to us?
> > > Linda in Everett
> > >
> >
>
|