Navigate Messages: by Date - in Thread
Main Index - Date Index - Thread Index
 

FW: [ranchos] Re: mtDNA and other DNA


 
Victor.....I don't know what is causing this but your message got truncated again......this time it is even shorter......Josie


From: ranchos@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ranchos@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of v.h.villarreal
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 12:00 AM
To: ranchos@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ranchos] Re: mtDNA and other DNA

--- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Josie T. Trevino" <Josiett3@s...> wrote:
>
> Victor.......is this the complete message? It appears that you left off in
> the middle of a sentence......Thanks! Josie
>
> _____
>

Josie, it looks like the message got truncated.  Below is a copy of that same message.

----------------------->

That's a keen observation and a good question about the number of differences in our mtDNA in relation to the CRS reference.

Let's start by saying that the CRS (Cambridge Reference Sequence) is just an arbitrary reference selected by some team of geneticist that were among the first to study the genetic sequences of mitochondrial DNA.  They decided to use the sequence of one of their subjects as a comparison reference, maybe one of their own samples, who knows?.  The selected mtDNA belongs to haplogroup H, the most prevalent haplogroup in Europe.  Therefore many Eur