This is a common occurence in my family. A set of brothers married to
a set of sisters or brother/sister married to sister/brother. I even
have a marriage extraction from my 6th great-grandfather who was
married in a double cermony. He and his brother married a set of
sisters.
I imagine that, part of this is due to arranged marriages...well not in
the traditional sense. In the case when one set marries first then
they introduce (or setup) the second set to one another and they too
end up gettting married.
I myself, have many 'double first cousins'. I think it happens more
often then people realize. Considering the term 'double first cousin'
can be found in genelaogy literature. It must come up often enough for
them to create a term for it. :) But I imagine it happened more often
in the small towns...not so much today.
Angie
--- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "John Gonzalez" <1gnzlz@v...> wrote:
>
> Correction:
>
> In my family tree I have: Four, first cousins, who are sisters.
The first two sisters married two brothers, and the other two sisters
are also married to brothers. The first two brothers are not "blood
related" to the second set of brothers. Can you beat that?. They all
live in the Sacramento area.
>
> John Gonzalez
> Wildomar, CA.
>
> 1gnzlz@v...
>
|