Thanks for the very nice and informative e-mail on the
surnames.
--- Pacorro73@... wrote:
>
> Ranchos,
>
> Soon after the Spanish Conquest of Mexico and
> thereafter during Colonial
> times, the ruling Españoles did not permit the
> Native Indians from possessing
> surnames unless the Indios were of a special allied
> family, the Indios somehow had
> earned themselves a surname, or eventually the
> adopted a surname out of names
> that were not necessarily surnames.
>
> Reyes is one such last name. Every year on January
> 6, the Catholic Church
> celebrates the Feast Day of the Epiphany, or Feast
> of the Magi, when the three
> wise king visited the Baby Jesus in Bethlehem. In
> Mexico and Spain the day is
> called EpifanÃa or â??DÃa de los Reyes Magos.â??
> The â??Reyesâ?? were called
> Melchor, Gaspar, and Baltazar. So as a result of
> this holy day, many children born
> on or near the holy-day were named one or a
> combination of the following:
> José Epifánio, MarÃa Epifánia, José de los
> Reyes, MarÃa de los Reyes, Melchor,
> Melchora, Gaspar, or Baltazar.
>
> This is essentially what happened to children born
> on other saint feast days.
> San Juan de la Cruzâ??s feast day prompted many
> children to be called Juan de
> la Cruz, Juana de la Cruz, José de la Cruz, MarÃa
> de la Cruz, etc. That is
> why so many Indios have the surname Cruz or De la
> Cruz. Same thing with
> surnames like Rosa, Rosas, De la Rosa, Bautista
> (after San Juan Bautista-St. John the
> Baptist), Trinidad (La SantÃsima Trinidad),
> Concepción (La Inmaculada
> Concepción), De Jesús, Ignacio, Xavier, Aquino
> (Santo Tomás Aquino-St. Thomas
> Aquinas), and many, many more I donâ??t remember
> right now.
>
> Many Indians children were baptized with these
> names, and over time surnames
> such as Reyes, de los Reyes, Melchor, Gaspar,
> Baltazar, etc., began to appear,
> not just in Mexico, but in other colonies, like the
> Philippines, Cuba, and
> Puerto Rico. That is how the native Tagalog, or
> freed African slaves got their
> last names also.
>
> As an example, I can relate the tale of my
> motherâ??s maiden name, López. My
> motherâ??s direct male line was López going back
> every generation until about
> 1720 or 1730. When I got back this far, I
> discovered who my first male López
> ancestor was. His name was Jacinto López, son of
> Juan Antonio de los Reyes and
> MarÃa Anna López, both Indios. As you can see,
> Jacinto López obviously used
> his motherâ??s surname. And that has been the
> surname used by my motherâ??s
> family, even though it should be de los Reyes. Juan
> Antonio de los Reyes and MarÃa
> Anna López, thus became the progenitors of the
> Indio surname López de los
> Reyes.
>
> But, not everyone who used these names were Indios,
> Mestizos, Mulatos, or
> Esclavos. Los Españoles also used these names
> also. I have begun to wonder if
> these Españoles used them because they were Jewish
> or Moorish conversos?
> Hhmmmhh??? I have an ancestress (actually several)
> who went by the name Melchora
> de los Reyes (named after Melchor, the Wise King),
> and she was an española.
> The first one then gave her name to her daughter,
> another Melchora de los Reyes,
> and then to her granddaughter, the third Melchora de
> los Reyes.
>
> Well I hope this data is helpful or insightful to
> you all. Good bye and God
> bless.
>
> Sincerely,
> Steven Francisco Hernández Gamiño y López de los
> Reyes
> (aka: Steven F. Hernández-López)
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|