|   |
In a message dated 9/10/2004 11:21:17 AM Central Standard Time, alice_wissing@... writes:
As far as some states never mentioning or listing the father's name, why would the priests try so hard to protect his identity? Double standards, perhaps, or is there a Catholic or cultural thing I'm not understanding?
Let's see if I can get this right: The priests would not necessarily be protecting the identity of the father, more like the priest would have not sanctioned such an off-spring, and so the woman and child forever was "labeled" because of their parent's indiscretions. However, on the other hand, where the Catholic Church and government often acted in unison - it meant that the illigitimate child and the mother never would have an opportunity to claim any inheritance from the father's family.
|
|
|   |